Are LLMs Just Fancy Parrots?

Pedro Teixeira
AI LLMs Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence

Astronaut with computer

Hey everyone! Let’s chat about something that’s been on my mind (and maybe yours too!) lately: Large Language Models, or LLMs. You know, the tech behind a lot of the super cool AI stuff we’ve been seeing.

The Parrot Analogy

For a while now, I’ve had this hunch, and it seems like some big names in tech are starting to agree: while LLMs are incredibly impressive, they might not be the golden ticket to truly consistent artificial intelligence.

Think of it this way: LLMs are like incredibly sophisticated parrots. They’re masters at predicting the next word (or “token”) in a sequence, which is why they can generate such convincing text, translate languages, and even write creative content. They’ve learned from mountains of data what sounds “right” based on patterns they’ve observed.

But here’s the kicker: they don’t actually understand what they’re saying. They don’t have an internal model of reality, or grasp the meaning behind the words in the way humans do. It’s like a parrot flawlessly repeating a complex sentence without having any clue what the sentence actually means.

The Simulation Problem

Apple recently put out a paper that really highlights this point, suggesting that LLMs don’t truly “think”; they simulate thinking. And when it comes to getting consistent, human-like reasoning capabilities from AI, a simulation just isn’t quite enough. We need something more robust, something that genuinely grapples with concepts and context.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m absolutely fascinated by what LLMs can do. They’re amazing tools and have opened up so many exciting possibilities. But if our goal is to build truly intelligent systems that can reason consistently and reliably, we might need to look beyond the “parrot” model.

Looking Forward

The good news? There’s a ton of incredible research happening right now in alternative AI architectures. Folks are exploring new ways to build intelligent systems that could get us closer to that consistent, human-like reasoning we’re all hoping for. And honestly, that’s something to be really excited about!